Claim EDU-08
Claim EDU-08
Reviews of programmes that improve children's executive functions find that trained skills transfer only narrowly, and expect the most successful approaches to address emotional, social and physical needs as well as cognitive ones.
- Its mark
- Speculative. Credible evidence that is subject to active debate, incomplete or failed replication, or evolving interpretation. Shifting ground.
- Basis
- finding. A claim about how the world is, answerable to evidence.
- Where it appears in the book
- Chapter 27, The Hierarchy Within and Beyond
- How it was checked
- Checked against the source
Sources
- Diamond, A., & Ling, D. S. (2016). Conclusions about interventions, programs, and approaches for improving executive functions that appear justified and those that, despite much hype, do not. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 34-48. DOI 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.11.005
Changes to this claim
No dispute about this claim has been resolved yet. Accepted disputes, and any change of mark they bring, are listed here with their dates.
Dispute this
If you think this claim or its mark is wrong, say why. A person reads every dispute, and the answer is posted on this page.
Disputes open when the site's dispute queue is connected. Until then, nothing typed here can be sent.