Claim EDU-10
Claim EDU-10
In the assessment of professional competence, reliability depends less on standardisation than on sampling: holistic expert judgements become reliable when they are sampled widely enough across occasions, content and judges.
- Its mark
- Known. Supported by robust, replicated evidence and accepted by the relevant scientific mainstream. Solid ground.
- Basis
- finding. A claim about how the world is, answerable to evidence.
- Where it appears in the book
- Part Five, What Can Be Measured and What Must Not Be
- How it was checked
- Checked against the source
Sources
- van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Schuwirth, L. W. T. (2005). Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Medical Education, 39(3), 309-317. DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02094.x
Changes to this claim
No dispute about this claim has been resolved yet. Accepted disputes, and any change of mark they bring, are listed here with their dates.
Dispute this
If you think this claim or its mark is wrong, say why. A person reads every dispute, and the answer is posted on this page.
Disputes open when the site's dispute queue is connected. Until then, nothing typed here can be sent.