Claim NAR-03

Claim NAR-03

When a choice is secretly swapped, about three people in four do not notice, and many give fluent reasons for a choice they did not make.Known (claim NAR-03: sources and how to dispute it)Ch. 19, 21

Its mark
Known. Supported by robust, replicated evidence and accepted by the relevant scientific mainstream. Solid ground.
Basis
finding. A claim about how the world is, answerable to evidence.
How it was checked
Checked against the source

Sources

  1. Johansson, P., Hall, L., Sikström, S., & Olsson, A. (2005). Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. Science, 310(5745), 116-119. DOI 10.1126/science.1111709

Changes to this claim

No dispute about this claim has been resolved yet. Accepted disputes, and any change of mark they bring, are listed here with their dates.

Dispute this

If you think this claim or its mark is wrong, say why. A person reads every dispute, and the answer is posted on this page.

Disputes open when the site's dispute queue is connected. Until then, nothing typed here can be sent.

We keep only what you type here, with the claim and the date. Name and email are optional.